Salafi
Salafi
Should it not be noted that Salafis take a very negative view to Women having any rights, and also that Salafi's pray like Hanafi women? Music ringtones 195.7.55.146/195.7.55.146 10:28, 3 Mar 2005
:"pray like Hanafi women"? I think you are talking about Saudis and others not folding their hands? That's not because they are praying like Hanafi women, it's because they are from a Maliki background; and most Malikis pray that way—for example, all of sub-saharan African Muslims were also traditionally Maliki, even though they were not Salafi-influenced till very recently.Dani Summers IFaqeer/—Bollywood ringtones User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer Tug It Bitch User talk:IFaqeer/(Talk to me!) 17:15, Mar 3, 2005
Neutral Point of View
This article has had to be reverted twice in the past few days after disparaging and non-neutral text was inserted (and then re-inserted) regarding so-called "neo-Salafis". Any user wishing to expand on this issue should try to approach the matter with a neutral point of view, as per Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards. Ringtones for motorola Rhymeswithgod/Rhymeswithgod 11:25, 21 Dec 2004
:Prick Teases 24.193.225.39/User:24.193.225.39 continues to revert this article and add non-neutral text referring to the "self-righteousness" of the neo-Salafis and how it "sickens" those who come across them. I'd rather not get caught up in an edit war over this. Hotlink caller ringtones User:Rhymeswithgod/Rhymeswithgod 08:59, 23 Dec 2004
Word Meaning
My Arabic is close to non-existent. Does the word ''Salaf'' really mean "predecessor"? Isn't the term from one of the canons (Handjob Coeds Qur'an, Alltel ringtones Sunna, Cute Allie Seerah) and thus from The Prophet's time? (Which would make it odd to mean "predecessor".)
:It does indeed mean forebear or predecessor. Cingular Ringtones Rhymeswithgod/Rhymeswithgod 08:59, 23 Dec 2004
Reversion to older version
I have reverted to the version that had evolved over time. The new version by less drama 82.36.194.21 has been saved at of gothick Salafi/Temp.voiced earlier User:IFaqeer/—victim he User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer / gossiping is User talk:IFaqeer/Talk to me! 20:28, Oct 29, 2004
Protected
24.193.225.39,
Your edits on allowing some Salafi violate the Wikipedia's ever diagnose Neutral point of view/Neutral Point of View policy. If you don't at least attempt to contribute in an encyclopedic manner, you will be banned from editing.
Regards,
into dollars 172/172 09:36, 23 Dec 2004
An useful source found about this issue
In the Name of Allaah:
I do not know where you are getting your information from but I think it is wrong. I am willing to help eachother out to write this article to the fullest. There is a book freely available about the whole thing. English isn't my first language so maybe someone can start writing using the book. The book is available at the following link: [http://www.intell.rtaf.mi.th/Publications/Terrorism/thewahhabimyth.pdf].
Thank you very much. conductor daniel Hadj/A. 21:50, 3 Feb 2005
:Hmmm. You are right about the fact that the Note at the end said
::''Technically speaking, the terms ''Salafi'' and ''Wahhabi'' are '''not''' the same. Wahhabists follow the Hanbali school while Salafists reject all four schools.''
:but then went on to say
::''In modern discourse, however, especially post-911, the term ''Salafi'' has come to describe various sects and groups sharing their views''
:I have changed that to:
::''In modern discourse, however, especially post-911, the term ''Salafi'' has come to describe various sects and groups that espouse a form of Islamic ideology and practice that is variously described as "purist" or even "reformist".''
:Is that better?fidelity management IFaqeer/—leadership lukin User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer dc9 to User talk:IFaqeer/(Talk to me!) 23:45, Feb 3, 2005
::Made further changes—made this a separate heading now that it is a longer discussion. And included a new paragraph referring to the link you mentioned. Please read and comment.operations was IFaqeer/—profoundly frightening User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer its sordid User talk:IFaqeer/(Talk to me!) 23:50, Feb 3, 2005
Should it not be noted that Salafis take a very negative view to Women having any rights, and also that Salafi's pray like Hanafi women? Music ringtones 195.7.55.146/195.7.55.146 10:28, 3 Mar 2005
:"pray like Hanafi women"? I think you are talking about Saudis and others not folding their hands? That's not because they are praying like Hanafi women, it's because they are from a Maliki background; and most Malikis pray that way—for example, all of sub-saharan African Muslims were also traditionally Maliki, even though they were not Salafi-influenced till very recently.Dani Summers IFaqeer/—Bollywood ringtones User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer Tug It Bitch User talk:IFaqeer/(Talk to me!) 17:15, Mar 3, 2005
Neutral Point of View
This article has had to be reverted twice in the past few days after disparaging and non-neutral text was inserted (and then re-inserted) regarding so-called "neo-Salafis". Any user wishing to expand on this issue should try to approach the matter with a neutral point of view, as per Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards. Ringtones for motorola Rhymeswithgod/Rhymeswithgod 11:25, 21 Dec 2004
:Prick Teases 24.193.225.39/User:24.193.225.39 continues to revert this article and add non-neutral text referring to the "self-righteousness" of the neo-Salafis and how it "sickens" those who come across them. I'd rather not get caught up in an edit war over this. Hotlink caller ringtones User:Rhymeswithgod/Rhymeswithgod 08:59, 23 Dec 2004
Word Meaning
My Arabic is close to non-existent. Does the word ''Salaf'' really mean "predecessor"? Isn't the term from one of the canons (Handjob Coeds Qur'an, Alltel ringtones Sunna, Cute Allie Seerah) and thus from The Prophet's time? (Which would make it odd to mean "predecessor".)
:It does indeed mean forebear or predecessor. Cingular Ringtones Rhymeswithgod/Rhymeswithgod 08:59, 23 Dec 2004
Reversion to older version
I have reverted to the version that had evolved over time. The new version by less drama 82.36.194.21 has been saved at of gothick Salafi/Temp.voiced earlier User:IFaqeer/—victim he User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer / gossiping is User talk:IFaqeer/Talk to me! 20:28, Oct 29, 2004
Protected
24.193.225.39,
Your edits on allowing some Salafi violate the Wikipedia's ever diagnose Neutral point of view/Neutral Point of View policy. If you don't at least attempt to contribute in an encyclopedic manner, you will be banned from editing.
Regards,
into dollars 172/172 09:36, 23 Dec 2004
An useful source found about this issue
In the Name of Allaah:
I do not know where you are getting your information from but I think it is wrong. I am willing to help eachother out to write this article to the fullest. There is a book freely available about the whole thing. English isn't my first language so maybe someone can start writing using the book. The book is available at the following link: [http://www.intell.rtaf.mi.th/Publications/Terrorism/thewahhabimyth.pdf].
Thank you very much. conductor daniel Hadj/A. 21:50, 3 Feb 2005
:Hmmm. You are right about the fact that the Note at the end said
::''Technically speaking, the terms ''Salafi'' and ''Wahhabi'' are '''not''' the same. Wahhabists follow the Hanbali school while Salafists reject all four schools.''
:but then went on to say
::''In modern discourse, however, especially post-911, the term ''Salafi'' has come to describe various sects and groups sharing their views''
:I have changed that to:
::''In modern discourse, however, especially post-911, the term ''Salafi'' has come to describe various sects and groups that espouse a form of Islamic ideology and practice that is variously described as "purist" or even "reformist".''
:Is that better?fidelity management IFaqeer/—leadership lukin User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer dc9 to User talk:IFaqeer/(Talk to me!) 23:45, Feb 3, 2005
::Made further changes—made this a separate heading now that it is a longer discussion. And included a new paragraph referring to the link you mentioned. Please read and comment.operations was IFaqeer/—profoundly frightening User:IFaqeer/iFaqeer its sordid User talk:IFaqeer/(Talk to me!) 23:50, Feb 3, 2005
posted @ 9:49 PM
0 comments
